- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Reasons, associated factors, and attitudes toward breastfeeding mothers’ use of complementary medicine products: a study from Türkiye
International Breastfeeding Journal volume 20, Article number: 3 (2025)
Abstract
Background
The use of Complementary Medicine Products (CMPs) has been increasing worldwide, including among breastfeeding mothers. This study aims to investigate the reasons and associated factors of CMP use among breastfeeding mothers in Turkey, alongside their attitudes and experiences.
Methods
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered, anonymous online survey between 17 December 2023 and 17 March 2024. Women from diverse regions across Türkiye, aged 18 years or older, with a child aged 36 months or younger, who were currently breastfeeding or had breastfed, were invited to participate in the survey.
Results
Among 445 mothers who completed the survey, 334 (75.1%) reported using at least one CMP during breastfeeding, with vitamin D, iron supplements, and fennel being the most frequently used. Educational level, employment status, and being a health worker were found to be factors associated with CMP use during breastfeeding, with those having university or higher education, being employed, or working in healthcare showing higher usage rates. The most common reasons for CMP use were “staying healthy” (60.2%) and “supporting immunity” (59.3%). While 91.9% of mothers perceived at least one CMP they used as beneficial, 14.4% of mothers using CMPs experienced adverse effects with at least one product. Safety perceptions of mothers who used CMP varied, with 45.8% believing CMPs were generally safe during breastfeeding. Among CMP users, doctors were chosen as the most trusted (n = 310, 92.8%) information source. A majority of mothers (85.6%) reported that they would like to receive more information about the safety and effectiveness of CMPs.
Conclusions
Breastfeeding mothers often use CMPs to stay healthy and support immunity. While healthcare providers are the most trusted source of information, many women get advice from family, friends, or herbalists, and some use CMPs without any recommendations. This underscores the importance of healthcare providers’ role in guiding mothers on the safe and informed use of both prescribed and self-prescribed CMPs.
Background
The use of Complementary Medicine Products (CMPs) has increased globally, not only in general medicine but also in the context of breastfeeding [1, 2]. Mothers frequently use CMPs during pregnancy and breastfeeding due to perceived benefits to maternal and fetal health, pregnancy support, and breast milk supply [3, 4]. It is reported that herbal galactagogues are frequently used to address breast milk insufficiency, and other herbal nutrients for strengthen postpartum health and recovery [1, 5, 6]. In addition, adequate nutrition during breastfeeding is very important for the health of both the mother and the baby. Breastfeeding mothers are particularly vulnerable to nutritional deficiencies [7], and nutritional supplements such as iron, vitamin D, and folic acid are widely recommended during pregnancy and breastfeeding [8].
In systematic review aiming to identify CMPs used in pregnancy and/or breastfeeding it is stated that only 9 out of 28 qualitative studies discussed CMP use during breastfeeding. Moreover it was noted that herbal medicines were the primary type of CMPs identified in the studies, with only three studies examined both herbal medicines and vitamin supplements [2]. The systematic review highlights significant research gaps regarding the use of CMPs during breastfeeding. In particular, there is limited information on women’s self-prescription practices and the sources of information they rely on when using CMPs. Furthermore, there is a lack of knowledge about the reasons mothers use CMPs during breastfeeding and how they perceive the benefits of these products. The aim of this study was to investigate breastfeeding mothers’ use of CMPs, reasons for use, and factors associated with their use, as well as mothers’ attitudes and experiences with these practices. In addition to understanding the perceived benefits or side effects of CMP use, the study also examined whether mothers were informed about possible side effects. By addressing these gaps, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of CMP use among breastfeeding mothers.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted through a web-based survey between 17 December 2023 and 17 March 2024.
Sample size
The study targeted women with a child aged 36 months or younger, who had breastfed for any duration. According to Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT) data, the total number of live births in the last three years is approximately 3,073,045 [9]. According to the 2018 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS), 98% of children were breastfed for at least some period of time [10]. Therefore, the target population of women with children under 36 months of age who have breastfeeding experience is estimated to be approximately 3,012,564. Although a previous study [11] conducted in a single province in Türkiye reported a prevalence rate of 15.1% for nutritional supplement use among breastfeeding mothers, the most conservative estimated prevalence rate of 50% was used to maximize the sample size, considering the higher prevalence rates reported in studies from different countries. The sample size for the study was calculated for a prevalence study using a 95% confidence interval and a 5% margin of error. Based on this, the representative sample size required was calculated as 384, and to accommodate potential exclusions, a larger sample size was aimed for.
Participants, recruitment and data collection
The target participants for this study were women from diverse regions across Türkiye. Women aged 18 years or older, with a child aged 36 months or younger, and who were either currently breastfeeding or had breastfed their child for any duration were invited to participate in the survey.
A self-administered anonymous online survey was conducted using the Survey Monkey platform. The survey was distributed on various online platforms, especially Instagram posts, Facebook and WhatsApp groups, in order to reduce selection bias and collect data from different regions of Türkiye. Convenience sampling was employed due to the practicality and accessibility of this method in an online environment. Participation was open to any eligible individual who accessed the survey link. Once the desired sample size was reached, data collection concluded. Participants were given informed consent and provided with detailed information about the study on the questionnaire’s first page. The mothers were informed that they had indicated their agreement to participate by responding positively to the first question. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Istanbul Medipol University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval Number: E-10840098-772.02-1).
Definition of CMP
CMPs are defined as dietary supplements (DS) and herbal medicines (HM). Dietary supplements are products intended to supplement the normal diet and include vitamins, minerals, proteins, carbohydrates, fibers, fatty acids, amino acids, and other nutrients or substances with nutritional or physiological effects. They are prepared in various forms such as capsules, tablets, lozenges, single-use powder packets, liquid ampoules, dropper bottles, and other liquid or powder forms with specified daily intake doses [12,13,14,15]. Herbal medicines include herbs, herbal materials, and finished herbal products that contain active ingredients, parts of plants, other plant materials, or combinations thereof [16].
Survey design
The self-administered semi-structured questionnaire used in this study was developed in Turkish by the research team, drawing upon existing literature on CMP usage among breastfeeding mothers. Prior to implementation, the questionnaire underwent a pilot testing phase to assess clarity, comprehension, identification of defective questions, and the time required for completion. Five volunteers meeting the inclusion criteria participated in the pilot test. Feedback from the pilot study was used to make minor adjustments. Pilot data was excluded from the final data analyses. The final version of questionnaire comprised three sections and encompassed a total of 28 items. It took approximately 15 min to complete. The first section comprised eight questions focusing on participants’ sociodemographic characteristics (age, level of education, employment status, occupation, household income, city of residence) and health-related attributes (the presence of chronic diseases and health service provider). The second section consisted of seven questions pertaining to child-related information (number of children, gestational age, mode of delivery, birth weight, gender and age of the youngest child, duration of breastfeeding). The third section encompassed 13 questions concerning CMP use including types of CMP used, reasons for usage, usage patterns (frequency and duration), age of the child when CMP was utilized, sources of recommendation and supply, experiences of side effects, perceived efficacy, as well as participants’ perceptions of CMP usage during breastfeeding. The most frequently used CMPs in literature were listed, and participants were asked to indicate which ones they used during breastfeeding. Additionally, an open-ended option was provided for participants to specify any other products they used. Consumption-related questions were addressed separately for each product used, employing multiple-choice questions for all items. Participants were also asked about their opinions on the safety of CMP use during breastfeeding period and responses were categorized on a five-point scale (totally agree, agree, neutral, disagree, totally disagree).
Measurements and statistical analyses
The collected data from participants were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.0.2.0. Continuous variables were described using mean ± SD, while categorical variables were presented using frequencies and percentages. Chi-square tests were employed to compare categorical variables. A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Characteristics of participants
Of the 621 mothers who agreed to participate in the study, 445 completed the survey, and only fully completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. Mothers from different regions of Türkiye participated in the survey with the majority residing in the Marmara region (n = 304, 68.3%). The average age of the mothers at the time of completing the survey was 32.4 years (± 4.8 SD), and 86.3% (n = 384) had a university or postgraduate degree. 61.3% (n = 273) of the mothers were employed, and 16.6% (n = 74) reported having a chronic disease, the most common being thyroid disease (32.4%, n = 24). The characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. Additionally, the characteristics of the participants according to the product type they used are provided in Table 1 of the supplementary file. A significant difference was detected between CMP users and non-users in terms of education level (p < 0.001), employment status (p = 0.023) and being a healthcare worker (p = 0.007) (Table 1). Those having university or higher education, being employed, or working in healthcare showed higher usage rates.
Types of complemetary medicine products used
Among participants, 75.1% (n = 334) reported using at least one CMP during breastfeeding. Most of these users (n = 288, 86.2%) took between one and five supplements, with a mean number of CMPs used of 3.2 ± 2.1 (median: 3.0, range: 1–12). It was determined that 29.9% (n = 133) of the participants used at least one HM product, 69.2% (n = 308) used at least one DS, and 24.0% (n = 107) used both. The most frequently used CMPs were vitamin D (n = 194, 43.6%), iron supplements (n = 153, 34.4%), fennel (n = 95, 21.3%), vitamin B12 (n = 89, 20.0%), and multivitamin/mineral (n = 78, 17.5%). The most commonly used herbal products were fennel (n = 95, 21.3%), garlic (n = 21, 4.7%), and ginger (n = 17, 3.8%). The usage rates of the products are shown in Table 2.
Reasons for using CMP
Participants’ reasons for using CMP are shown in Table 3. The most common aim of use was found to be ‘staying healthy’ (n = 201, 60.2%) and ‘supporting immunity’ (n = 198, 59.3%). Among HM users, the most popular reasons were ‘to increase breastmilk’ (n = 94, 70.7%) followed by ‘to support immunity’ (n = 46, 34.6%), ‘to help the baby grow healthy’ (n = 32, 24.1%), and ‘stay healthy’ (n = 31, 23.3%).
Source of recommendation and provision
While most of the mothers used CMPs based on recommendations from physicians, most commonly obstetricians (51.5%), it was determined that 25.7% of the mothers used them without any recommendation. The sources of product recommendations are shown in Table 4. Mothers most frequently obtained products from the pharmacy (87.7%), followed by the herbalist (16.8%). Among mothers using CMP, 59.3% were not informed about the possible side effects of the product.
Experience with CMP use
A large proportion of mothers (91.9%, n = 307) perceived at least one CMP they used as beneficial. Specifically, 93.5% (n = 288) of those who used DS reported experiencing benefits, while 72.2% (n = 96) of those who used HM found benefits. Additionally, 26.3% (n = 35) of mothers who used HM indicated uncertainty regarding the benefits of some products they used, compared to 16.6% (n = 51) of those who used DS who reported uncertainty. Regarding side effects, 14.4% (n = 48) of all mothers using CMPs experienced adverse effects with at least one product, with varying rates observed among those using DS (14.6%, n = 45) and HM (6.8%, n = 9). Data on experience with CMP use are presented in Table 5. Considering the distribution of side effects, constipation (n = 13), diarrhea (n = 2), and nausea (n = 2) were reported due to iron use. Apart from these, the use of brewer’s yeast has been reported to cause increased appetite (n = 1), weight gain (n = 2), and gas (n = 1).
Safety perceptions and information preferences
When participants were asked about their views on the safety of CMP use during breastfeeding, 45.8% (n = 153) of CMP users agreed with the statement ‘I think it is generally safe to use dietary supplements or herbal products while breastfeeding.‘, while 27.2% were not sure (no opinion).
Similarly, 46.4% of DS users and 45.9% of HM users agreed with the belief that it is generally safe to use dietary supplements or herbal products while breastfeeding. Physicians were the most trusted source of information chosen by 92.8% (n = 310) of CMP users, followed by literature (n = 99, 29.6%), and lactation consultants (n = 74, 22.2%). When looking at specific product types, 94.2% of DS users and 93.2% of HM users also trusted physicians. Lactation consultants were trusted by 22.1% of DS users and 31.6% of HM users. The majority of CMP users (85.6%) expressed a desire to receive more information about the safety and efficacy of CMPs during breastfeeding. This interest was consistent across product types, with 86.7% of DS users and 82.7% of HM users indicated interest in further information. Data on the safety perceptions and information preferences of mothers is shown in Table 6.
Discussion
According to the World Health Organization’s Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014–2023, the prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) use globally ranges from 23.0 to 82.0% [17]. CAM use is also common among pregnant and breastfeeding women; however, there is limited data specifically on CMP use among breastfeeding mothers.
Our study contributes significant information on the usage patterns, reasons for use, and the experiences of mothers regarding CMPs. We found that 75.1% of participants reported using at least one CMP during breastfeeding, with DS (69.2%) being more frequently used than HM products (29.9%). The most commonly used CMPs were vitamin D (43.6%), iron supplements (34.4%), and fennel (21.3%). The primary reasons cited for CMP use were ‘staying healthy’ (60.2%) and ‘supporting immunity’ (59.3%). Additionally, 59.3% of mothers using CMPs were not informed about potential side effects, indicating a gap in the communication in information. These findings highlight the widespread use of CMPs among breastfeeding mothers and the importance of understanding the factors influencing their usage.
Various sociodemographic factors are associated with CMP use. In the study conducted by Zheng et al., employment status, monthly income, and breastfeeding-related problems were associated with the use of traditional and complementary medicine (TCM) [18]. Kaygusuz et al. found that TCM use during breastfeeding was associated with younger age, high school education, perception of insufficient breast milk, and previous TCM use during pregnancy [19]. Sim et al. found that middle-income families use HM more frequently [20]. Also, there are studies reporting that high education level is associated with the use of HM [11, 21, 22]. Additionally, the age of the breastfed child, perceived health status [23], and race or ethnicity [20, 24] have been reported as factors associated with HM use while previous use of CMP [25, 26] has been noted as a factor associated with CMP use. In our study, educational level, employment status, and being a health worker were associated with CMP use during breastfeeding. These findings suggest that CMP use is influenced by a complex interplay of sociodemographic factors.
The rates of CMP use during breastfeeding vary across studies. The reported rate of TCM use during breastfeeding ranges from 52 to 97.1% [18, 25, 27], while HM use has been reported between 31.37% and 97% [20, 23, 27,28,29]. The higher proportion of dietary supplement use compared to herbal medicine use observed in our study aligns with some previous findings but differs from others. In the study of Kaygusuz et al., it was reported that the most frequently used TCM method was herbal products [19]. In a study from Italy, it was reported that herbal preparations were used by 31.37% and dietary supplements by 32.35% of breastfeeding mothers [27]. In a study conducted by Orbatu et al. in which 312 mothers participated, it was found that 15.1% used CMPs during breastfeeding and 8.3% used non-vitamin/mineral (mostly in the form of herbal extract) products [11]. In our study, the widespread use of dietary supplements may be linked to their routine recommendation by healthcare professionals, particularly for vitamin D and iron, which are routinely prescribed postpartum and suggest that dietary supplements are more widely accepted among breastfeeding mothers. The differences in the prevalence of HM use across studies may be explained by the social acceptance of HM due to cultural influences [20, 23].
The most commonly used dietary supplements among CMP users in our study were Vitamin D, Iron, B12, Multivitamin and Fish Oil. Similarly, in a study from Australia [30] reported that the most popular dietary supplements among breastfeeding mothers were multivitamins, probiotics, iron supplements, Vitamin D, and omega-3. In a study from China, it was reported that lecithin, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), omega-3 fatty acids were the most commonly taken TCMs other than herbal products [18]. Clinical studies support the benefits of vitamin D and iron supplements for both mothers and infants during breastfeeding, leading to their routine prescription as part of maternal care [8]. In Turkey, a complete blood count is requested for mothers suspected of anemia, while others are started on iron prophylaxis. For vitamin D, routine screening for deficiency during pregnancy or breastfeeding is not standard practice. Instead, it is recommended to administer 1200 IU/day of vitamin D from the 12th week of pregnancy until the end of the 6th month postpartum. While these supplementation programs may explain why vitamin D and iron were the most frequently used CMPs in this study, our findings also indicate suboptimal adherence to these recommendations in the postpartum period, with 56.4% of respondents not using vitamin D and 65.6% not using iron. Another important determinant of DS use could be nutritional deficiencies that may arise during the antenatal or postnatal period. Particularly postpartum anemia is a common condition, often caused by iron deficiency and peripartum blood loss [31] can lead to the need for iron supplementation [32, 33]. Our study did not account for these deficiencies, which may have influenced CMP use, especially the use of iron supplements. As a result, it is unclear whether the high use of DS observed in our study was for general supplementation or for therapeutic purposes.
Herbal medicines were the main complementary medicine products investigated in the literature during lactation [2, 3]. The herbal products most frequently used in our study were fennel, garlic, ginger and fenugreek. Although the plants most mentioned in the studies are fenugreek, ginger, dong quai [20], chamomile [30], fennel, licorice root, and green tea [29], it is seen that different herbals appropriate to the cultural structure are used in studies conducted in different parts of the world. In some regions, Tetrapanax papyriferus, Vaccaria segetalis [18], black pepper, pumpkin seeds [22], Cassia sieberiana, Luffa acutangula, Roxb [23] are reported to be frequently used. In a study conducted in our country, the most commonly used herbal products among breastfeeding women were found to be fennel, anise, mint, linden, dill, and ginger [19].
A systematic review found that the two main reasons why women choose to use CMPs are to protect themselves or their babies from adverse events and to support the normal physiological processes such as pregnancy, birth and breastfeeding [2, 4]. In our study, the most common reasons for CMP use were maintaining general health and supporting immunity. These findings are consistent with previous research, highlighting the preventive role mothers attribute to CMPs during the breastfeeding period. Similar to studies reporting the frequent use of herbal medicines for lactation support and galactagogue purposes, the most popular reason among HM users in our study was ‘to increase breast milk’ [20, 22, 24, 34]. In a study of 810 women, the majority reported feeling that CMPs had been beneficial for their own and their children’s health [4]. Likewise, in our study, the vast majority of mothers who used CMP reported experiencing benefits.
The decision to use CMP during breastfeeding is shaped by a complex network of information sources [3]. In our study, it was determined that mothers most frequently received advice from physicians about the use of CMP. A systematic review reported that the most frequently accessed sources of information about CMPs were healthcare professionals, followed by interpersonal relationships and media [3]. In a study conducted in Iran the most common reason for using TCIM products was advice from healthcare personnel or relatives [25]. However, there are also studies showing that health professionals play a less important role [19, 20, 23]. In a study from Türkiye, mothers primarily consulted their relatives for information about TCM methods [19]. In an online survey conducted among breastfeeding mothers, almost half of the participants reported learning about fenugreek through internet sources [34], while in our study, a low proportion of women indicated social media or the internet as a source of advice. Although it is thought the fact that mothers in rural and remote areas can easily access these drugs via the internet may have an effect in increasing the use of CMPs [4], in our study, the majority of mothers obtained products from pharmacies (87.7%), with a low rate from the internet (12.6%). Herbal medicine products were most frequently obtained by mothers from herbalists (41.4%) and grocery stores (33.1%).
Mothers may seek information on health issues from various sources based on accessibility, their perception of the safety, and alignment with their health beliefs [2]. In a survey conducted in Australia, general practitioners, obstetricians and midwives emerged as the most trusted health professionals [4]. In our study, it was determined that doctors were the source that mothers trusted the most, which is consistent with previous research [35].
Previous studies have suggested that CMPs are frequently used during pregnancy and breastfeeding due to personal preference and perceived safety [18, 34, 36,37,38]. In our study, 45.8% agreed, and 14.7% strongly agreed that using CMP during breastfeeding is generally safe. In a study conducted in Türkiye [19], 34.9% of breastfeeding mothers perceived herbal medicines and TCM methods as safe. Similarly, in a study conducted in Italy, 73% of women reported that CAMs were equally safe or safer than conventional medications [27].
Informing breastfeeding women about the potential benefits and possible risks of CMP use is very important for the health of both mothers and breastfed babies. Participants of a study in Australia believed that there was lack of information regarding the use of herbal medicine during breastfeeding [20]. In a systematic review about safe and appropriate use of herbal products by nursing mothers, it was noted that pharmacists can play a role in providing necessary guidance to breastfeeding women [39]. In our study, despite products being most commonly recommended by health professionals and obtained from pharmacies, 59.3% of mothers using CMPs reported not receiving information about the potential side effects of the product. Additionally, 85.6% of mothers who used CMP indicated that they would like more information about the safety and efficacy of dietary supplements or herbal products during breastfeeding, underlining the importance of health professionals providing guidance on the use of CMP during breastfeeding.
Limitations
Our study has several limitations. One important limitation was the accuracy of self-reported product use. Mothers may have underreported their use for various reasons, such as not remembering, misremembering or under-remembering. Additionally, the lack of information on postnatal deficiencies, such as anemia, limits our ability to distinguish between supplementary and therapeutic use. The study was based on a self-administered online survey, which may introduce potential subject bias, as women with a particular interest in CMPs or those already using them are more likely to participate. Furthermore, while the study covered multiple regions, the sample distribution was not proportional to the population, and the overrepresentation of well-educated women limits the generalizability of the results to the broader population of breastfeeding mothers in Türkiye. Despite widespread internet usage in Türkiye (85.4% among women according to official statistics), our findings may not fully capture the experiences of less active online users.
Conclusion
Breastfeeding mothers often use CMPs for a variety of health reasons, including staying healthy and supporting immunity. While physicians are reported as the most trusted source of information for mothers, many women use CMPs without any recommendations. However, many mothers also report a need for more guidance on the safety and effectiveness of these products. Therefore, it is clear that healthcare providers need to take a more active role in counseling mothers about both prescribed and self-prescribed CMPs to ensure informed decision-making and safe use of CMPs.
Data availability
The anonymised data collected are available as open data via the Science Data Bank online data repository: https://www.scidb.cn/en/s/Zbiyue.
References
Zapantis A, Steinberg JG, Schilit L. Use of herbals as galactagogues. J Pharm Pract. 2012;25(2):222–31. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/0897190011431636.
Barnes LAJ, Barclay L, McCaffery K, Aslani P. Complementary medicine products used in pregnancy and lactation and an examination of the information sources accessed pertaining to maternal health literacy: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18:229. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12906-018-2283-9.
Barnes LAJ, Barclay L, McCaffery K, Aslani P. Complementary medicine products: information sources, perceived benefits and maternal health literacy. Women Birth. 2019;32:493–520. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.11.015.
Barnes LAJ, Rolfe MI, Barclay L, McCaffery K, Aslani P. Women’s reasons for taking complementary medicine products in pregnancy and lactation: results from a national Australian survey. Complemen Ther Clin Prac. 2022;49:101673. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101673.
Sim TF, Hattingh HL, Sherriff J, Tee LBG. Perspectives and attitudes of breastfeeding women using herbal galactagogues during breastfeeding: a qualitative study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:216. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1472-6882-14-216.
Bazzano AN, Hofer R, Thibeau S, Gillispie V, Jacobs M, Theall KP. A review of herbal and pharmaceutical galactagogues for breast-feeding. Ochsner J. 2016;16(4):511–24.
Carretero-Krug A, Montero-Bravo A, Morais-Moreno C, Puga AM, Samaniego-Vaesken MDL, Partearroyo T, et al. Nutritional status of breastfeeding mothers and impact of diet and dietary supplementation: a narrative review. Nutrients. 2024;16(2):301. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/nu16020301.
Kominiarek MA, Rajan P. Nutrition recommendations in pregnancy and lactation. Med Clin North Am. 2016;100(6):1199–215. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.mcna.2016.06.004.
Birth Statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Birth-Statistics-2023-53708&dil=2 [Accessed October 13, 2024].
Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. 2018. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. https://hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/en/2018_turkey_demographic_and_health_survey-198 [Accessed October 13, 2024].
Orbatu DS. Use of nutritional supplement in breastfeeding mothers and related reasons. J Tepecik Educ Res Hosp. 2020;30(1):66–71. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5222/terh.2020.04809.
National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements. Botanical Dietary Supplements Background Information. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/BotanicalBackground-Consumer/ [Accessed May 19, 2024].
Republic of Türkiye. Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Livestock. Regulation on the Importation, Production, Processing, and Marketing of Dietary Supplements. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=18341&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 [Accessed May 19, 2024].
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. FDA 101: Dietary Supplements. Published online June 9. 2022. https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/fda-101-dietary-supplements [Accessed May 19, 2024].
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements. FDA. Published online March 7. 2024. https://www.fda.gov/food/information-consumers-using-dietary-supplements/questions-and-answers-dietary-supplements [Accessed May 19, 2024].
World Health Organization. Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine. https://www.who.int/health-topics/traditional-complementary-and-integrative-medicine [Accessed May 7, 2024].
WHO traditional medicine strategy. 2014–2023. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241506096 [Accessed May 7, 2024].
Zheng T, Chen W, Hu H, Wang Y, Harnett JE, Ung COL. The prevalence, perceptions and behaviors associated with traditional/complementary medicine use by breastfeeding women living in Macau: a cross-sectional survey study. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020;20:122. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12906-020-02921-8.
Kaygusuz M, Gümüştakım RŞ, Kuş C, İpek S, Tok A. TCM use in pregnant women and nursing mothers: a study from Turkey. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021;42:101300. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101300.
Sim TF, Sherriff J, Hattingh HL, Parsons R, Tee LB. The use of herbal medicines during breastfeeding: a population-based survey in Western Australia. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:317. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1472-6882-13-317.
Chuang C-H, Chang P-J, Hsieh W-S, Tsai Y-J, Lin S-J, Chen P-C. Chinese herbal medicine use in Taiwan during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a population-based cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(6):787–95. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.12.015.
Millinga VP, Im HB, Hwang JH, Choi SJ, Han D. Use of herbal medicines among breastfeeding mothers in tanzania: a cross-sectional study. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:751129. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fphar.2022.751129.
James PB, Kaikai AI, Bah AJ, Steel A, Wardle J. Herbal medicine use during breastfeeding: a cross-sectional study among mothers visiting public health facilities in the western area of Sierra Leone. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019;19:66. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12906-019-2479-7.
Budzynska K, Filippelli AC, Sadikova E, Dog TL, Gardiner P. Use and factors associated with herbal/botanical and nonvitamin/nonmineral dietary supplements among women of reproductive age: an analysis of the infant feeding practices study II. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016;61:419–26. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jmwh.12482.
Molavi Vardanjani H, Salehi Z, Alembizar F, Cramer H, Pasalar M. Prevalence and the determinants of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine use among breastfeeding mothers: a cross-sectional study. J Integr Complement Med. 2022;28(1):67–76. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1089/jicm.2021.0270.
Barnes LAJ, Barclay L, McCaffery K, Aslani P. Complementary medicine products information-seeking by pregnant and breastfeeding women in Australia. Midwifery. 2019;77:60–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.midw.2019.06.011.
Bettiol A, Lombardi N, Marconi E, Crescioli G, Bonaiuti R, Maggini V, et al. The use of complementary and alternative medicines during breastfeeding: results from the herbal supplements in Breastfeeding InvesTigation (HaBIT) study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(9):2040–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/bcp.13639.
Tang L, Lee AH, Binns CW, Hui YV, Yau KKW. Consumption of Chinese herbal medicines during pregnancy and postpartum: a prospective cohort study in China. Midwifery. 2016;34:205–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.010.
Aleandri V, Bertazzoni G, Romanzi D, Vetrano G, Durazzi F, Mazzanti G, et al. The use of herbal products during breastfeeding: a study from a public Italian hospital. J Food Process Technol. 2014;05(8):1000354. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4172/2157-7110.1000354.
Barnes LAJ, Rolfe MI, Barclay L, McCaffery K, Aslani P. Demographics, health literacy and health locus of control beliefs of Australian women who take complementary medicine products during pregnancy and breastfeeding: a cross-sectional, online, national survey. Health Expect. 2022;25(2):667–83. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/hex.13414.
Neef V, Choorapoikayil S, Hof L, Meybohm P, Zacharowski K. Current concepts in postpartum anemia management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2024;37(3):234–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001338.
Moya E, Phiri N, Choko AT, Mwangi MN, Phiri KS. Effect of postpartum anaemia on maternal health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:364. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12889-022-12710-2.
Iron supplementation with. or without folic acid to reduce the risk of postpartum anaemia. https://www.who.int/tools/elena/interventions/iron-postpartum [Accessed October 13, 2024].
Bazzano AN, Cenac L, Brandt AJ, Barnett J, Thibeau S, Theall KP. Maternal experiences with and sources of information on galactagogues to support lactation: a cross-sectional study. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:105–13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2147/IJWH.S128517.
Robinson A, Cooper S. Trusted information sources: the preferred option for complementary and alternative medicine users. Complement Health Pract Rev. 2007;12:120–38.
Sim TF, Hattingh HL, Sherriff J, Tee LBG. The use, perceived effectiveness and safety of herbal galactagogues during breastfeeding: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(9):11050–71. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ijerph120911050.
Colaceci S, Giusti A, De Angelis A, Della Barba MI, De Vincenti AY, Vellone E, Medications, et al. Natural products, and pharmacovigilance during breastfeeding: a mixed-methods study on women’s opinions. J Hum Lact. 2016;32(2):324–32. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/0890334415619746.
Amer MR, Cipriano GC, Venci JV, Gandhi MA. Safety of popular herbal supplements in lactating women. J Hum Lact. 2015;31(3):348–53. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/0890334415580580.
Zheng T, Yao D, Chen W, Hu H, Ung COL, Harnett JE. Healthcare providers’ role regarding the safe and appropriate use of herbal products by breastfeeding mothers: a systematic literature review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019;35:131–47. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.01.011.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: D.D.B., N.K., H.B.Ç. Methodology: D.D.B., N.K., H.B.Ç., A.K. Investigation: H.B.Ç., Ö.Ö., Ö.B. Data curation: D.D.B., M.B. Formal analysis: D.D.B., M.B. Writing- Original Draft Preparation: H.B.Ç., Ö.Ö., M.B. Writing—review and editing: D.D.B., N.K., A.K., Ö.B. Visualization: D.D.B.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Istanbul Medipol University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval Number: E-10840098-772.02-1).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bilgin, D.D., Karabayir, N., Çetinkaya, H.B. et al. Reasons, associated factors, and attitudes toward breastfeeding mothers’ use of complementary medicine products: a study from Türkiye. Int Breastfeed J 20, 3 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13006-024-00687-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13006-024-00687-0