Skip to main content

Table 3 Primary outcomes comparisons between IC and CG

From: Effectiveness of a new breastfeeding counselling intervention on breastfeeding prevalence, infant growth velocity and postpartum weight loss in overweight women: a randomized controlled trial

Variables

Overall

IG

CG

PR/difference

95% CI

p value

EBF prevalence at 4 months (n = 65; IG = 29; CG = 36)

      

 Yes

35 (53.8)

24 (82.8)

11 (30.6)

2.7

1.6, 4.5

< 0.001**

 No

30 (46.2)

5 (17.2)

25 (69.4)

   
 

Overall (n = 65)

IG (n = 29)

CG (n = 36)

PR/difference

95% CI

p value

Infant change in WLZ (mean, SD)

      

 Change in WLZ from 0 to 4mo

0.69 (± 0.7)

0.75 (± 1.3)

0.65 (± 1.7)

0.1

-0.6, 0.8

0.76

 Change in LAZ from 0 to 4mo

0.25 (± 0.9)

0.4 (± 0.9)

0.1 (± 1.0)

0.22

-0.3, 0.7

0.36

Maternal weight loss

      

 1st wk pp to 4 months in kg (mean, SD)

3.1 (± 5.0)

1.9 (± 4.7)

4.2 (± 5.1)

-2.2

-0.2, 4.8

0.07

 1st wk pp to 4 months in % (mean, SD)

4.03 (± 6.6)

2.5 (± 6.4)

5.4 (± 6.5)

-2.9

-0.38, 6.2

0.08

  1. Abbreviations: IG, intervention group; CG, control group; EBF, exclusive breastfeeding; WLZ, weight for length Z-Score; LAZ, length for age Z-Score; PR, prevalence ratio.
  2. * Statistical significance at the level of < 0.05.
  3. Group comparisons were performed with Chi2-test for categorical variables and for continuous variables with t test as all continuous variables were normally distributed.